<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>CSSKarma &#187; twitter</title> <atom:link href="http://www.csskarma.com/blog/tag/twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.csskarma.com/blog</link> <description>display your style</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:18:44 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>Send it through Twitter</title><link>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/twitterfeed/</link> <comments>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/twitterfeed/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 12:47:50 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[social]]></category> <category><![CDATA[lastfm]]></category> <category><![CDATA[music]]></category> <category><![CDATA[pandora]]></category> <category><![CDATA[sharing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.csskarma.com/blog/?p=911</guid> <description><![CDATA[I get a lot of questions about how I share articles on Twitter, so I though I would just write it up real quick since I just synced up some more accounts to my stream. I do most of my article gathering through Google Reader, which has a &#8220;share&#8221; option at the bottom of each [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get a lot of questions about how I share <a
href="https://twitter.com/#!/csskarma/status/72737431920713728">articles on Twitter</a>, so I though I would just write it up real quick since I just synced up some more accounts to my stream.</p><p>I do most of my article gathering through <a
href="http://google.com/reader">Google Reader</a>, which has a &#8220;share&#8221; option at the bottom of each article you read. If you follow me on Google, you probably get these articles in the &#8220;shared by others&#8221; category, but for those of you who don&#8217;t, I use the RSS feed of shared items that Reader puts out piped through an RSS to Twitter service (personally, I use <a
href="http://twitterfeed.com">TwitterFeed</a>).</p><p>It&#8217;s not a perfect service, it will only push out articles every 30mins or so, but I find it more than adequate for my purposes. If something really great comes along and TwitterFeed isn&#8217;t an option, I sometimes push it out by hand to Twitter. And I actually think the 30mins delay is a good buffer so I don&#8217;t flood anyone&#8217;s Twitter stream with articles.</p><p>Google Reader also has a bookmarklet for things you want to share that&#8217;s outside your subscriptions. It&#8217;s very nice, I highly recommend it. You can get the RSS feed and &#8220;Note in Reader&#8221; bookmarklet from the &#8220;<a
href="http://twitpic.com/20tk6e">Share</a>&#8221; tab down the left side of the page.</p><p>That&#8217;s how you get the Tweets formatted like &#8220;Currently reading&#8221; and &#8220;From CSSKarma&#8221;. I also recently hooked up Pandora, LastFM and YouTube to the services&#8230; so look out.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/twitterfeed/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Twitter and the Downfall of Social Networking</title><link>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/twitter-and-the-downfall-of-social-networking/</link> <comments>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/twitter-and-the-downfall-of-social-networking/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 23:51:29 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category> <category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.csskarma.com/blog/?p=502</guid> <description><![CDATA[One of the great things about the folks at Twitter is that they really stick to what they&#8217;re good at and they let the community define what they want out of the service. So much so that they&#8217;ve responded with some really great community-driven Twitter services. MySpace The downfall of MySpace started when users were [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img
src="http://www.csskarma.com/images/articles/downfall.jpg" alt="article banner" /></p><p
class="intro">One of the great things about the folks at <a
rel="external" href="http://twitter.com/">Twitter</a> is that they really stick to what they&#8217;re good at and they let the community define what they want out of the service. So much so that they&#8217;ve responded with some really great community-driven Twitter services.</p><p><strong>MySpace</strong></p><p>The downfall of <a
rel="external" href="http://www.myspace.com">MySpace</a> started when users were given too much control in design their profiles. Then the spam started pouring in like crazy. Everyone had a MySpace account, even corporations, and they were all collecting &#8220;friends&#8221;. Profiles became bloated and ugly; and shortly after that, a viable alternative came along and users started migrating over to <a
rel="external" href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> in an attempt to flee the spam.</p><p><strong>Facebook</strong></p><p>Facebook solved the MySpace design problem by removing that level of control from the users. Then (maybe to make up for it) they opened up to customizations through user-created applications. And the downward spiral began, yet again.</p><p>Users began abusing the apps and we were all subject to invites to Mafia teams and Vampire squads.</p><p>It&#8217;s gotten so bad that I can&#8217;t log into Facebook without some sort of asinine notification or spam coming from one of these wonderful apps generated by the &#8220;community&#8221;. You know there&#8217;s no way Facebook will step in and take control of the apps, so we just have to find ways around them as they add in (false sense of) security features.</p><p>Unfortunately, when we look at these 2 monsters of social networking, it appears that the problems all start with giving users too much control.</p><h4>Do they actually want control?</h4><p>Where&#8217;s the problem? Is it a perception of the user? Or is it that I&#8217;m way off base here, and the user actually wants a web site they can be totally engulfed in all day long? I&#8217;m not convinced users want the amount of control sites like Facebook and MySpace give them.</p><p>I know millions of people use Facebook apps, but maybe they&#8217;re just using them because they&#8217;re available. I don&#8217;t get the feeling that if all these apps never existed anyone would really care. I didn&#8217;t hear anyone complain about lack of control in Facebook before the apps came along; not a single person.  They were just happy to get out of MySpace.</p><p><strong>Look at what Twitter&#8217;s done so far: </strong></p><ul><li>They&#8217;ve stripped down user profiles &#8211; no one cares</li><li>They gave you very controlled design options &#8211; there&#8217;s been no outcry</li><li>The pretty much made your personal Twitter page useless &#8211; I&#8217;m not even sure anyone has noticed</li><li>They allow almost anyone to follow your updates &#8211; so what?</li></ul><p>If anything, the Twitter model is showing us users just want some core functionality. They really don&#8217;t want a place they can list their favorite books, movies and TV shows; it&#8217;s all just fluff.</p><h4>Telling the user no</h4><p>Twitter&#8217;s found a way to let us know that what we want isn&#8217;t a priority for them. And by using a &#8220;Do it yourself&#8221; attitude and releasing a well thought out and flexible API<strong>, we love them for it</strong>. It&#8217;s a little twisted, but it&#8217;s working really well. They&#8217;re picking and choosing what users have requested they want to address.</p><p>By releasing an API with so many options Twitter&#8217;s essentially hired thousands of developers for free to build add-ons to their site that are completely independent from Twitter (<strong>that have nothing to do with pirates OR vampires</strong>). And it allows them to really focus on features they think are important like search and giving a false sense of control.</p><p>Telling the community &#8220;if you want it, build it yourself, but keep it out of my site&#8221; accomplishes something Facebook really fails at: <strong>keeping out the crap</strong>. By forcing these user apps to be external you can cut out the spam and let users find them on their own. Of course, we&#8217;re already starting to see the much anticipated &#8220;Twitter Trends&#8221; starting to get hit with spam.</p><h4>Great services that came from the community</h4><ul><li><a
rel="external" href="http://twitpic.com">TwitPic</a></li><li><a
rel="external" href="http://wefollow.com/">WeFollow</a></li><li><a
rel="external" href="http://www.twitlonger.com/login">TwitLonger</a></li><li><a
rel="external" href="http://www.rememberthemilk.com/services/twitter/">Remember the Milk for Twitter</a></li><li><a
rel="external" href="http://twitterfeed.com/">TwitterFeed</a></li><li><a
rel="external" href="http://twitter.polldaddy.com/">Twitter PollDaddy</a></li></ul><p>Giving power to the community is a good thing, but if we learned anything from MySpace and Facebook it&#8217;s that this power needs to be well thought out and controlled in a way where the users don&#8217;t feel like they&#8217;re being controlled.</p><p>Whomever can come up with that will come out as the real social networking giant.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/twitter-and-the-downfall-of-social-networking/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>13</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Replacing an old Flame</title><link>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/replacing-an-old-flame/</link> <comments>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/replacing-an-old-flame/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:17:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[social]]></category> <category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.csskarma.com/blog/?p=377</guid> <description><![CDATA[Earlier this week (this morning) I had a sorted break up with long-time-used FireFox add-on TwitterFox. Admittedly, I didn&#8217;t really plan for it &#8211; it just happened one day. Then there I was using the Web interface to update my Tweets. Which is fine, I actually prefer the Web interface over all the desktop apps [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img
src="http://www.csskarma.com/images/articles/replacing-an-old-flame.jpg" alt="article banner"/></p><p>Earlier this week (this morning) I had a <a
href="http://twitter.com/csskarma/status/1311132774">sorted break up</a> with long-time-used FireFox add-on <a
href="http://twitterfox.net/" rev="vote-against" rel="nofollow">TwitterFox</a>. Admittedly, I didn&#8217;t really plan for it &#8211; it just happened one day. Then there I was using the Web interface to update <a
href="http://twitter.com/csskarma/">my Tweets</a>. Which is fine, I actually prefer the Web interface over all the desktop apps that have been built.</p><blockquote><p>Breaking up is like knocking over a coke machine. You can’t do it in one push, you&#8217;ve got to rock it back and forth a few times, and then it goes over.<cite>- Jerry Seinfeld</cite></p></blockquote><p>I had been unhappy with TwitterFox for a while (almost since the beginning), I was just using it because I needed something, it was the best I found, and I didn&#8217;t feel like doing more research on it.</p><p>Overall, it was an OK experience because I feel like I know exactly what I want in a Twitter updater. I know what I liked about TwitterFox, and, most importantly, what I hated about it.</p><h4>TwitterFox Pros and Cons</h4><h5>Pros</h5><ul><li>Presence &ndash; I have a browser open all day, and it&#8217;s right there, very fast to update, not a separate app eating up all my RAM</li><li>@replies &ndash; It usually caught my @replies even when I wasn&#8217;t the 1st @ listed in a  tweet</li></ul><h5>Cons</h5><ul><li>Pop ups &ndash; I hate the intermittent pop ups of tweet. I&#8217;m sure it can be turned off, but I hated it</li><li>Pop up interval &ndash; on the off chance that I wanted to read a tweet as it popped up, if the text was long, it didn&#8217;t stay popped up long enough to read. Then I&#8217;d have to stop and go read the tweet</li><li>Lazy &ndash; it stopped catching all my @replies (the last month or so).</li><li>Replying &ndash; the way replies functioned bothered the crap out of me</li><li>I just didn&#8217;t like it.</li></ul><h4>Researching replacements</h4><p>Just by looking at some people I follow on Twitter, I came up with a pretty good list of TwitterFox alternatives to investigate.</p><h5>Apps</h5><p>I don&#8217;t like the external apps for Twitter updates, but I&#8217;m going to give them all a try and see if I can get into it:</p><ul><li><a
href="http://www.twhirl.org/" rel="external">Twhirl</a></li><li><a
href="http://thecosmicmachine.com/" rel="external">EventBox</a></li><li><a
href="http://www.destroytoday.com/projects/destroytwitter" rel="external">destroyTwitter</a></li><li><a
href="http://iconfactory.com/software/twitterrific" rel="external">Twitterific</a></li><li><a
href="http://www.tweetdeck.com/beta/" rel="external">TweetDeck</a></li><li><a
href="http://gettwidget.com/" rel="external">Twidget</a></li><li><a
href="http://www.digsby.com/" rel="external">Digsby</a></li><li><a
href="http://getsnitter.com/" rel="external">Snitter</a></li></ul><h5>In-browser options</h5><ul><li><a
href="http://www.twittergadget.com/">TwiterGadget</a></li><li><a
href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4664" rel="external">TwitterBar</a></li><li><a
href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6845" rel="external">TwitKit</a></li><li><a
href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/7631" rel="external">TwitBin</a></li></ul><p>That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m planning to look in to right now. Are there any I missed? I&#8217;m open to pretty much anything right now. I was with TwitterFox for a while (maybe a year?) and generally not pleased with it, so I want to make sure to find something that really fits.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/replacing-an-old-flame/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>10</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>This Week in Links 10/27</title><link>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/this-week-in-links-8/</link> <comments>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/this-week-in-links-8/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:04:50 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category> <category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[finances]]></category> <category><![CDATA[font]]></category> <category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category> <category><![CDATA[jquery]]></category> <category><![CDATA[seo]]></category> <category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.csskarma.com/blog/?p=213</guid> <description><![CDATA[Better CSS Font Stacks A good article on how to jazz up your stacks to try and take advantage of users who have more fonts installed. I&#8217;m all for this, and as long as it&#8217;s done carefully, can get a nice version of progressive enhancement. 5 Terrible SEO Ideas Richard Bradshaw goes over some trendy [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img
src="http://www.csskarma.com/images/articles/this-week-in-links.jpg" alt="article banner"/></p><h5><a
href="http://unitinteractive.com/blog/2008/06/26/better-css-font-stacks/" rel="external">Better CSS Font Stacks</a></h5><p>A good article on how to jazz up your stacks to try and take advantage of users who have more fonts installed. I&#8217;m all for this, and as long as it&#8217;s done carefully, can get a nice version of progressive enhancement.</p><h5><a
href="http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/" rel="external">5 Terrible SEO Ideas</a></h5><p>Richard Bradshaw goes over some trendy (and terrible) things that are common in SEO such as: keyword stuffing, dupe content, link farms, splash pages, and cloaking.</p><h5><a
href="http://jqueryfordesigners.com/fun-with-overflows/" rel="external">Fun with Overflows</a></h5><p>I think this is a <strong>great</strong> idea (<a
href="http://jqueryfordesigners.com/demo/scrollable-timelines.html" rel="external">check out the demo</a>). It creates a very similar interface to that of <a
href="http://www.plurk.com" rel="external">Plurk</a>, the twitter competitor.</p><h5><a
href="http://www.tweetwhatyouspend.com/" rel="external">Tweet What you Spend</a></h5><p>This is a pretty cool service that uses the Twitter API to track spending. I know it can seem kind of geeky (as is reading articles about CSS&#8230;), but tracking your spending is a great way to save money, it gives you a lot of power when you know exactly how your paycheck disappears every month. Provided you don&#8217;t mind sharing your expenses with the <a
href="http://twitter.com/csskarma/" rel="external">Twitterverse</a>, this is a good service and very easy to use.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/this-week-in-links-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>This Week in Links 10/6</title><link>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/this-week-in-links-6/</link> <comments>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/this-week-in-links-6/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:21:57 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category> <category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[jquery]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mac]]></category> <category><![CDATA[maintainability]]></category> <category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.csskarma.com/blog/?p=157</guid> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img
src="http://www.csskarma.com/images/articles/this-week-in-links.jpg" alt="article banner"/></p><h5><a
href="http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/index.php/successfully-present-your-web-designs-to-clients/" rel=external">Successfully Present Your Web Designs to Clients</a></h5><p>Dave Woods put together a nice article in response to Andy Clarke&#8217;s article on <a
href="http://forabeautifulweb.com/blog/about/time_to_stop_showing_clients_static_design_visuals/" rel="external">static visuals</a>. I&#8217;m linking this one up because I think a lot have already read Andy&#8217;s and I think Dave did a nice job on this one.</p><h5><a
href="http://blog.position-absolute.com/javascript-jquery/jquery-featured-products-animation-now-it-look-cool/" rel="external">Feature your Products with jQuery</a></h5><p>This is a cool jQuery trick from a blog I just started reading a couple weeks ago.</p><h5><a
href="http://www.slideshare.net/nataliedowne/css-systems-presentation" rel="external">Writing Maintainable CSS</a></h5><p>Unfortunately, my link posts are a little backed up right now, so this is probably a week old at this point. But it&#8217;s a direct link to the slide show on writing maintainable CSS. I disagree with some of it, but overall, a good presentation.</p><h5><a
href="http://arielwaldman.com/2008/09/23/space-madness-in-social-media/" rel="external">Space Madness</a></h5><p>Ariel is, from what I can gather, awesome, and a consultant for NASA. In this post she described how Twitter is being used on Neptune!</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/this-week-in-links-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The way of the web</title><link>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/the-way-of-the-web/</link> <comments>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/the-way-of-the-web/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 02:43:43 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>timwright</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category> <category><![CDATA[internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.csskarma.com/blog/?p=14</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been in web development for a couple years now, mostly behind the scenes CSS coding (which I dig), so I&#8217;ve worked with quite a few different designers that basically email me a jpg or psd of what they want a site to look like and I make it happen. I notice a trend that [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been in web development for a couple years now, mostly behind the scenes CSS coding (which I dig), so I&#8217;ve worked with quite a few different designers that basically email me a jpg or psd of what they want a site to look like and I make it happen. I notice a trend that has started become more and more prevalent since I went to An Event Apart &#8211; Boston back in March and paid closer attention to typographic, column placement, grid layouts, and readability.</p><p>Call it being stuck inside the box, or whatever, but I see a lot of designers clinging onto the concept that the web should look like something tangible (book, magazine, dog, etc.). While the its considered pretty young&#8230;around 21 years old&#8230; I think the web has been around long enough and created such a great presence for itself that it can be separated from aspects of the physical world. Of course, this don&#8217;t concern most website out there, but who said that nytimes.com has to look like a digital news paper. I understand the branding issues that come with making an online news paper look like the paper version, but with the influx of XML/RSS, I don&#8217;t see any reason to not have fun with designing on the web.</p><p>Anyways, this is my maiden post to the blog and, in a nutshell, I think there are still far too many people not using the web to its fullest potential.<br
/> my2cents</p><p>with_ease,<br
/> Tim</p><p></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/the-way-of-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/16 queries in 0.079 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.csskarma.com @ 2012-02-09 16:08:54 -->
