<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lack of news and some hot topics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.csskarma.com/blog/lack-of-news-and-some-hot-topics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/lack-of-news-and-some-hot-topics/</link>
	<description>display your</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aroully</title>
		<link>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/lack-of-news-and-some-hot-topics/#comment-25524</link>
		<dc:creator>Aroully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csskarma.com/blog/?p=62#comment-25524</guid>
		<description>I`am new girl on www.csskarma.com .Let's gets acquainted! 
My name is Victoria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I`am new girl on <a href="http://www.csskarma.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.csskarma.com</a> .Let&#8217;s gets acquainted!<br />
My name is Victoria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/lack-of-news-and-some-hot-topics/#comment-9045</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csskarma.com/blog/?p=62#comment-9045</guid>
		<description>That's a good read. I will however have to disagree with the author. 

I think it's well within Facebook's rights to protect their investment and not let Google access the data. Last I heard they weren't even turning a profit.

If the user wants to consider it their "data" then maybe they should pay some of the hosting fee for Facebook. I think it's the user's "information", but still Facebook's "data".

My2cents on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good read. I will however have to disagree with the author. </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s well within Facebook&#8217;s rights to protect their investment and not let Google access the data. Last I heard they weren&#8217;t even turning a profit.</p>
<p>If the user wants to consider it their &#8220;data&#8221; then maybe they should pay some of the hosting fee for Facebook. I think it&#8217;s the user&#8217;s &#8220;information&#8221;, but still Facebook&#8217;s &#8220;data&#8221;.</p>
<p>My2cents on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/lack-of-news-and-some-hot-topics/#comment-9038</link>
		<dc:creator>Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csskarma.com/blog/?p=62#comment-9038</guid>
		<description>Things have been heating up with the discussion of data portability. Facebook (Facebook Connect), Google (Friend Connect) and MySpace (Data Availability) released or declared support for a data portability model in the last week. Facebook decided to block Google's Friend Connect, so let the wars begin! Check out this article at &lt;a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/16/data-portability-its-the-new-walled-garden/" rel="nofollow"&gt;TechCrunch&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things have been heating up with the discussion of data portability. Facebook (Facebook Connect), Google (Friend Connect) and MySpace (Data Availability) released or declared support for a data portability model in the last week. Facebook decided to block Google&#8217;s Friend Connect, so let the wars begin! Check out this article at <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/16/data-portability-its-the-new-walled-garden/" rel="nofollow">TechCrunch</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
