<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Breed of Microformat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.csskarma.com/blog/a-new-breed-of-microformat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/a-new-breed-of-microformat/</link>
	<description>display your &#60;style&#62;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 04:09:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: finance business bfi</title>
		<link>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/a-new-breed-of-microformat/comment-page-1/#comment-45397</link>
		<dc:creator>finance business bfi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 10:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csskarma.com/blog/?p=113#comment-45397</guid>
		<description>finance bfi business</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>finance bfi business</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/a-new-breed-of-microformat/comment-page-1/#comment-23971</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csskarma.com/blog/?p=113#comment-23971</guid>
		<description>I think they&#039;re actually realizing that there isn&#039;t any brand loyalty and people are staying with Facebook or Myspace out of pure laziness (they have all their stuff set up already). An big issue in getting those people over to a new service is to make the entry cost as low as possible.

What&#039;s best is that they&#039;re hiding the technology, which is the best way to get things out to the general public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;re actually realizing that there isn&#8217;t any brand loyalty and people are staying with Facebook or Myspace out of pure laziness (they have all their stuff set up already). An big issue in getting those people over to a new service is to make the entry cost as low as possible.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s best is that they&#8217;re hiding the technology, which is the best way to get things out to the general public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aiya101</title>
		<link>http://www.csskarma.com/blog/a-new-breed-of-microformat/comment-page-1/#comment-23970</link>
		<dc:creator>Aiya101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csskarma.com/blog/?p=113#comment-23970</guid>
		<description>So...we all know Google is snatching up everything it can that adds to its suite of Web apps. Do you think this tagging is a way of promoting &quot;brand loyalty&quot; through ease (a.k.a. surpassing even OpenID within the Google network and catering to the less-than-savvy Web users)? And, as for the rest of us - I think we all hate having 30 different user names and passwords to get access to the latest Web apps. I wonder if Google is looking to fill the gap of getting all types of users to use Web apps (the way AOL did for basic web access)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;we all know Google is snatching up everything it can that adds to its suite of Web apps. Do you think this tagging is a way of promoting &#8220;brand loyalty&#8221; through ease (a.k.a. surpassing even OpenID within the Google network and catering to the less-than-savvy Web users)? And, as for the rest of us &#8211; I think we all hate having 30 different user names and passwords to get access to the latest Web apps. I wonder if Google is looking to fill the gap of getting all types of users to use Web apps (the way AOL did for basic web access)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
